| You are completely missing what he is saying (and I am agreeing with)...
When you agree with what the Court is doing, such as this overturning of the Patriot Act provisions, you look at the reasoning and declare that the Court is doing its job.
When you disagree with what Court is doing, such as Kelo v. New London, you look at the reasoning and declare that the Court is unconstitutionally "interpreting" (:rolleyes:) something.
The only difference is whether you happen to agree with their decision or not. The "evidence" of you doing this are your posts on this board.
"But it wasn't until he met his beautiful wife that he learned using logic and reason isn't enough. You have to be a dick to everyone who doesn't think like you." - South Park on Richard Dawkins |