[Osborn F Enready]

I am not here supporting child porn, in the least.

I in no way advocate or view child porn, and personally find it quite disgusting.

My point, is that this is another, in a line of many case, where there is massive ability for coercion, collusion and fraud, while seeking to infringe on privacy rights of individuals who are by law, recognized as having those rights to privacy.

*hint: All bad legislation is grounded in "noble sounding" causes, very real, while often mis-defined risks and problems within society.

Good legislation shows cause and effect clearly through the use of vetted, valid objective evidence, timelines, non-biased statistical data, solicitation of public opinion on the issue, case examples, etc. and attempts to deal with the issues with respect to individual rights, in a constitutional manner.

Bad legislation hits on all the fears and risks that people perceive, but never really addresses cause and effect with valid, all-encompassing data, often instead using one sided data, biased sources, including (pac, or special intrest group)citizen solicitation of opinion, statistical data that is lacking of time or scope, case examples that trend to one side.