| "There is no equimenical distribution based on one's effort or product."
Yes there is, haven't you taken European History? The harvest/agrian culture that permeated Europe was highly collective and distributed everything based on need, which is the same driving force in Socialism.
"Their wages are based on the 'accepted industry standard"
which they themselves CONSENT to earn. If they disagree, they can try their own hand at business, or get a new job. They AGREE that they deserve that much.
"controlled by self-serving plutocrats and defended by the bourgeoisie, who seek to become part of the plutocratic aristocracy."
The Benefit reaped by the poor from the rich cannot be understated. I doubt i can't explain it better than this so here goes. I highly suggest you read the entire book:
Whats wrong with Liberty? |