| What would you think, if your homestate of the Union we call the United States did this?
State officials grant legality to a program that removes the rights of privacy to all workers, whose companies choose to use the program, against the will of the workers, and if the workers protested, their only option is to quit regardless of time in job, experience, or prior record.
(this in itself is unconstitutional, as far as removing the rights of privacy)
This state implemented program also, by using Federal funding, allowed participants of the program an unfair advantage to those not using the program by lowering REQUIRED PAYMENTS to workers compensation, and healthcare from CO-OPERATING insurance companies, which would allow them to outprice, outbid, or out perform other companies through the assistance and compliance and participation in the State program. This also locks outnon-cooperating insurance companies, as alternatives to employees based on price, coverage or any other standard other than program compliance.
This program also, removes your rights as a citizen of the United States, to be innocent until proven guilty, and forfeits your rights to trial should the case come up concerning employment ability, before or after accused.
This program, also, using false facts, propaganda, and scare tactics tries to coerce employees by having the program explained by their own "salesman", after being "invited" by the employer. When giving the presentation, and being asked to provide areas where those facts could be REFERENCED, or PROVEN, they have no provision, or answer to allow you to do so.
What I have explained above, is the "Ohio Drug Free Workplace Program".
I would also like to know if knowing the name of the program, changed your opinion of the description, and why.
Look forward to your thoughts and comments.
Petition of Redress of Grievances:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/default.htm
Canadian Lawsuit Against Their National Banks:
http://www.freewebs.com/classaction/
Osborn F. Enready |