Quote:
Quote by: Osborn F Enready  Educate yourself moron.... he has never supported individuals owning nuclear arms.
I called you a moron, clearly a personal insult, because you are OPENLY lying, creating lies, and being a general putz!
I think I may have just lost all respect for you. Please report me.
He supports individual rights and individual responsibility, and to no suprise, SO DOES THE CONSTITUTION. Prohibition of drugs is AS if not MORE unconstitutional than prohibiting alchohol.
Once again, spinning YOUR views on Rons policy, not Rons actual policy. Get your facts straight, if that is possible.
Why is that Techno? Do you even have a CLUE?!? Perhaps you could explain to me where the Constitution allows the Federal Government to do the actions you wish done?
And it is the RESPONSIBILITY of the local areas where these companies reside, to petition and DEMAND that those corporations, businesses or companies live up to the publics expectations if they want to keep their corporate charter, or PERMISSION of incorporation.
Defend your side of the argument.
Its not an important topic if you don't have a country to stand in, or people to address, due to gross fiscal mismanagement, bankrupting the American people, and betraying the public trust to the point of fostering revolt.
Ron wants to address what is addressable FIRST, and then worry about issues like "global warming".
That is because the expense of charity and social welfare IS THE RESPONSIBILITY of CHARITY ORGANIZATIONS, not government.
Open your eyes....
Amen brother. |
I saw that interview when they gave him that Moore question about nuclear weapons. He started laughing and then dissmissed it as not a serious question. Everyone knows that such a weapon would be very expensive, even Saddam could not buy one. And it is not a handy the kind of thing to use for your personal protecton as not much would be left of your house if you used it on someone breaking in your back door. Do not be silly... we all know he is talking about any kind of weapon that people currently wish to market to the average gun buyer who might shop at Sears ( if they still sold them ). In the philosophy some interpret from the Consitution we must be able to defend our self from an army supported by our government if the Feds went wacco. To do that you would need weapons equal to what our mitlitary can employ on us if so commanded - right? It seems Ron Paul would be for that. But no one would take serious that revolutionists would want a nuclear civil war.
I did not say that drugs were good or bad, I simply said he would allow such activity to remian legal if a state vote said "okay to getting high".
If someone is seriously an anti-drug person the Ron Paul might not be his best choice, that is all to that.
About Natonal Parks and the environment. Did you EVER concider that the Consitution does not contain words about every single problem that might confront people as a nation, or state? It is not an "answer all document". If the Consitution said nothing about a topic then we must use our own noodle inside out heads to deal with the new problems that become self-evident as the country grows and progresses. Do you think the Constitution was writen to replace the human brain? Well, think again if you still have one.
Why would they have something in the Consitution about National Parks? Why would York Town need a park if within a 10 mins you could just walk right out of town into a vast wilderness. Be rereasonable.
Polution is no longer just a local problem to be delt with on a local bases, it has become an international problem of much larger proportion and concern. He might be knowledgable about American history but he seems to ignore science books.
You are right, he wants to avoid dealing with the important threat of global warming. I can accept no excuse for that kind of behavior from a President.
Right - if people want a Federal government that sets an example of not wanting to be responisble then Ron Paul is their guy. He will set a good example of irresponsibilty for one and all.
This spin is not to muddy the waters, this spin gives us a clearer look at his politics.