Quote:
Originally posted by Pooeypants,+--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Pooeypants,)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> Quote: Originally posted by shunyadragon,@
<!--QuoteBegin-Sonart, | Quote:
I have an even simpler one. Creationists would like to see Creationism taught as an alternative to evolution, since they feel neither can be proven. But they are speaking specifically of the Biblical create myth. If Creationists want us to be so open minded, how about the Hindhu creation myth or the Hopi creation myth or the Norse creation myth or the Chinese creation myths? Are they not just as valid?
I have a better idea. Let's leave science to science. |
Still waiting for the 'Creation Science' advocates to respond to the challeges. |
In another Thread, Theophysics was recommending we read Michael Behe. Shall I start to post the debunks on his works on ID and IC, or will you like that honour?[/b][/quote]
Fire away, I see Theophysics and Behe's stuff on Elba and they are weak. The two challenges I presented have never been refuted.
The empty cup contains the most
Frank A Doonan
Turn weapons into peace and friendship with gifts of jade-silk
www.shunyadragon.com
I do not know, therefore I think . . .