Quote:
Quote by: xyzer Pooey..I'm amused
You ignore the fact that you haven't varied in your argument or approach to climate change? I'm the one who has posted a number of scientifically backed refutations to the tired old argument about anthropogenic influences on climate. |
I've yet to see these scientifically backed refutations, where are they? Do you mean those misleading articles with misconstrued claims and bad arguments?
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer I'm the one who early on challenged the "hockey stick" nonsense |
I have already refuted your unjustified claim on the validity of the hocket stick graph
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer and yet you are still posting charts showing C02 increases on Mauna Loa and other illogical rationalizations for climate change? |
I posted it in response to the misinformation that we have caused little CO2 increase. Because that is a lie.
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer Ignoring facts about temperature measurement and flawed interpretations, the importance of natural causes influencing the earths climate ad infinitum? |
No, I have never ignored those factors, I have asked you many times over to present evidence to explain the current warming. For which I have seen you produce zilch of any value.
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer Each little bit of evidence that the C02 theory is shakey is met with denial, questiong the honesty of the sources, or blaming big oil or some other 'strawman" for influencing data and opinion? It's almost unreal? But I remain undaunted..rave on if you please...  |
All you can do is crawl away at the edges because that's all you have. If you're so certain, why don't you mail your concerns to the National Science Academy of America? That's just one amongst many organisations in the US alone that you're opposing.