Quote:
Quote by: Zeebadee  What crap. You didn't predict an 8.0 earthquake, you predicted "within the next 30 days the news will report two major earthquakes.". You didn't define what constitutes a "major" earthquake, you didn't tell us anything about what kind "would be abnormal enough to be concidered by most to be unpredictable", and you didn't define what "something odd would happen earthquake wise" means either. You didn't even really predict that ANY earthquakes would actually occur at all, merely that "the news will report two"
Your "prediction" is nothing more than meaningless drivel. Why don't you demonstrate some REAL faith and plug a few specifics into your next "prediction"? Have you got the guts to put your "equation" to a real test? |
If I did not mention the magnitude before because it was not important to state such. And I later defined "major" as a quake that would become a major news story. None the less someone gripped that quakes up too a magnitude of 7.9 are 'common' and so this is like predicting the sun will shine tomorrow. Where as a stronger magnitude happens on an aveage of only once per year.
In spite of your attempt to downplay this experiment it still stands as proven. Two major events involing reported earthquakes happened that became very newsworthy. Events that were odd enough and that CNN spent a lot of air time to cover. Those "quakes" stood out relative to all the normal quakes that happen which are not major news events.
Such events do not happen on a regular bases each month.
It is impossible to "have the guts" to give more details because my guts were not the Source of those predictions. The data I related came too me not from me, and I cannot add what was not provided in the way of details because I can only report what I get "from out of the blue". If details did not come from out of the blue then I work with what I get.