Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul  Only a 1 chance of a 8.0 quake happen during a year, as in Peru. Add to that the chance that it would likewise become a big news story because it happen in a populated area and lots of people died. No one can predict that using normal stats, and narrow the window for it happening to the time limits of the next month, but I did based on my formula without knowledge of what the 'averages' are.
I was not trying to predict earthquakes that happen most of the time at least somewhere on earth. I was predicting the kind that would be abnormal enough to be concidered by most to be unpredictable.
The data from "out of the blue" did not give details but only the fact that something odd would happen earthquake wise within 30 days, not once but twice.
See above post #22. The evidence supports that my experiment had positive results favoring my theory. |
What crap. You didn't predict an 8.0 earthquake, you predicted "within the next 30 days the news will report two major earthquakes.". You didn't define what constitutes a "major" earthquake, you didn't tell us anything about what kind "would be abnormal enough to be concidered by most to be unpredictable", and you didn't define what "something odd would happen earthquake wise" means either. You didn't even really predict that ANY earthquakes would actually occur at all, merely that "the news will report two"
Your "prediction" is nothing more than meaningless drivel. Why don't you demonstrate some REAL faith and plug a few specifics into your next "prediction"? Have you got the guts to put your "equation" to a real test?