Quote:
Quote by: xyzer  Here is another well reasoned discussion of the impact of a recently discovered anomaly in NASAs temperature measurements.(Data that was used in ?# of scientific studies and included in the well publicised news of climate doom?) Notes in the Margin · Implications of NASA’s Climate Data Errors
It turns out that there was a warmer decade in the 1930s after all? The warmest year was apparently 1934 and not 1998 which was ballyhoo'd as definitive evidence that C02 increases were warming the climate to 'unprecedented heights'? NASA and the media seem reluctant to correct the record and try to reveal truth?..reveal its possible impact on some of these scientific studies, charts and graphs that have been held up a proof of certainty? Can it be that the suggested correlation between anthropogenic C02 increases and climate warming is not "certain"? That something else caused the cooling cycle during the 1950s and 60s? |
Allow me to quote a well known Global warming skeptic, the blogger himself who apparently worked out the error.
Quote:
|
McIntyre has said he had fun discovering the flaws, but called the adjustment a "micro-change."
|
Source
Of course, when the US comes to represent the entire globe, we'll have a lot to answer for, but as it stands, even that critic himself that this made little difference in the grand scheme of things.
Btw, it's CO2, not C02.