Quote:
|
Pray tell, you keep criticising these proxy, but do you have an alternative method of reconstructing the past temperatures? Come on then, show me. Show the scientific world where they've gone wrong, I mean, the way you talk you've obviously got some substance to back it up.
|
I don't need any alternate method of reconstructing past temps because there are records and general evidence of past temperatures...
which show temperatures and climate cycles have varied, obviously due to natural influences!
Don't you get it, the climate alarmists have set out to prove their contentious premise by reconstructing past climate records to show that there is reason to suspect human influence in the latest cycle of climate change? Some convert available and proxy evidence into support for their original assumption(premise) that humans are responsible for climate change and can influence it by reducing their energy consumption?
You are like a broken record and force me into the same tactic?