| Pathos, how quaint.
Other than needing a shocking metaphor to back up weak logic, why did you think a baby with a gun is a logical comparison. In this case it is not the gun that is the danger but the idiot that placed the gun in the crib, he is much more likely to kill the baby from his stupidity that the baby managing to shoot himself. But working with your silly analogy, exactly what part of the baby's body is going to be able to fit past the trigger gaurd and exert the needed pressure to set it off? If all your logic is this well thought out, you might want to give up serious debate.
Actually the main threat of nukes is some human deciding to commit mass genocide, just like it was before the weapon existed. So exactly what has changed? |