Quote:
Quote by: lsbskins1  It is reasonable to require fencing and reasonable to require parents to supervise their children. |
Then what you are talking about is making the unfenced neighbor
share liability with the aloof parent. This is quite a different matter from the attractive nuisance doctrine, where the aloof parent is the plaintiff and the unfenced neighbor is the defendant.
If liability is shared, who then is the plaintiff and who is the defendant?