[christibe]

Ok well the article is actually gone now.

In general, I think that if there are $300 to go to every drug and/or alcohol addicted woman, that money should be spent for rehabilitation purposes, instead of stating

"Well, you are addicted to drugs, and therefore you are a worthless human being. Since there is no hope for you, we do not want you to have any kids. So, you can take 300 whole dollars and we will either sterilize you so that you may never leave any kind of mark whatsoever on this world, except for the time I had to waste on you to fix ya', like so many stray dogs. Or, you can get these shots, or whatever the contraceptive-of-choice is for the lady in the article, and I would actually not like this one, 'cuz it means I'll have to see you again in another 3-6 months."

So, I think that this line of thought will eventually lead to, "Well, how about instead of wasting $300 on worthless drug addicts, we instead just kill them. That only costs the price of a bullet, and if we burn them, we will not have to rot next to them in our own graves."

Then, there is no more problem at all. And no more waste of government money on the crackheads, right?

So- like I said, I didn't read the article and the lady may have been very well respectful of addicts and seeks only to help them. I don't know what her plan is at all. But, the idea of it led me to write this post.

sorry.