Quote:
Quote by: Autolykos  I use "freedom" in three main ways.
Metaphysically, I consider "freedom" to be synonymous with "free will". Here freedom cannot be denied, taken away, etc. In a metaphysical sense, freedom is an inherent property of man.
Physically, I consider "freedom" to mean "the absence of outside physical forces". This usage ties in with free will in the sense that one may wish to do something, but external forces prevent him from doing so.
Socially, I consider "freedom" to mean "the absence of outside physical forces directly caused by other human beings". Of course, what constitutes direct causation in the context of human beings may be open to debate.
- Rob |
Isn't it ironic that, given the definitions you've suggested, a person could enjoy metaphysical freedom, social freedom, and as much physical freedom as possible, and utterly lack the wherewithal to do anything with their freedom.
One wonders what's the good of freedom if you still couldn't do anything you might want or acquire what you might need.
Under your definitions Rob, one can be perfectly free--which many argue is a good thing, even the highest human aspiration--and die of starvation through no fault of his or her own.
Regards
S.