View Single Post
Old Aug 1, 2007, 08:44 pm   #3 (permalink) (top)
Yarn
Igneous Magma
 
Yarn's Avatar
 
Location: Southwest Conneticut
Posts: 250
I don't see whats wrong with attacking terrorists and others in Pakistan, whom threaten Canadian and US lives in Afghanistan, and at home.

Iraq was a bad idea for the US, but Afghanistan is highly accredited with having thrown Al Qaeda and the Taliban into disarray.

Why should it be stated therefore that the Taliban and Al Qaeda cannot be thrown into disarray again, by attacking them in Pakistan's northwest territories, their new headquarters.

Quote:
Quote by: Rainbow View Post
Pakistan has not granted a permission, for any U.S. military action(s) that may take place on Pakistani soil.
We have justified pre-text. People are attacking us from Pakistan, and Pakistan given time and money, has not done a sufficient amount about it.

We should take into account what the Pakistani governmental response to us going in without permission would be. We should think beforehand, what effect it will have on the climate of the overall region that will be effected by the attacking.

We should exert whatever means we could rightfully use to pressure the government into giving us permission, but Pakistan under sensible leadership will not go to war with us, over us taking action against our enemy.


A closed mind is a dead mind.
Yarn is offline   Reply With Quote