Quote:
Quote by: Clarence  this question sucks because I really want and believe Paul would be a fine republican. Therefore, it is probably a good question to ask him.
a standard question for some reason. He should form a good answer. But it's hard to say the right anwser without suggesting serious crimes that haven't been put to trial. If we didn't need Paul to win, I'd almost let the man alone.
I would love if he had the opportunity to answer this question. I don't know how, I just know he knows what to say.
This is not a fair way to ask a question. When people do this to president bush, regardless of the validity of the underlying point, it turns someone on the recieving end off. The recieving end could be paul in this case or anyone who feels this is an unfair way to appoach a subject on the spot.
As for the question it might be alright.
I'll bet I know the answer to this. ahh I'll bet he wants to point out that by defining the gender specifics of a marraige is not a good idea because it forces us to define the person along gender lines legally which is a slippery slope in itself. Compare his answer to gays in the military on that one debate. yeah that one debate.
what's your angle? I may like your question if I've understand it correctly.
you're a funny guy
It appears as though Ron needs to bring out the best from each voting pool. His job is easy because all he has to do is be true. The common sense will almost corner our representatives and force them to act likewise. To which our enemy's response likley will be to defame then if that fails murder.
good question.
this is hard to irradicate. He should say that education and jobs along with prosperity will alleviate this condition to some degree. he doesn't believe that we should have the dept of education. I wonder if that means he doesn't believe in public educationas well?
there's a softball. good man yes!
I would like to hear his answer. I'm not sure what I want to hear.
He should point out that armed revolution isn't necessary if you can convey the truth. The people are good. The key is communication. This is a great segway to securing our election process. if that is possible, which is my next question
I swear I didn't know this was the next question..
***I have taken the liberty of speculative answers***
I do not know Ron Paul's answers /disclaimer |
Question 7 would be some old guy who is concerned because his SS check is way below the new cost of living demands. As the amount is based on earning form the past when wages and costs were much less then they are today. So you are trying to live in 2007 on a budget that would only work if you lived back in the 1960s. Therefore a retired person who worked his life away at low wage jobs must live in the streets or get a job again. What kind of job? Welcome to Walmart.