Quote:
Quote by: Technosoul  A lot of people here in the science forum has objected to some of my theory making that came to me from 'out of the blue'.
Because I did not provide a test that would effect a result that can be confirmed.
And so over in the Religion and Philosophy forum I posted a formula.
Belief + faith = expected result. (wihin limitations so noted in that OP).
I tested this by reporting and predicting that above average earthquakes will occur within the time limitations of the following 30 day period. (future).
That was on July 19, 07. I predicted not just one but that two major earthquakes would happen.
Most people feel that normally no one can predict when a earthquake will happen.
The following day (Sat. July 21) a 6 point earthquake shook South America. Then on Sunday July 22 two more 6 point magnitude earthquakes occured in China and in Western Iran. According to the news reports. Damage reports still pending. Those happening during the first three days of the total window of 30 days. The China quake left about 2000 people homeless.
The predictions founded on my belief and faith in the 'knowing' that came to me from out of the blue. In total so far since that prediction of a few days ago the world has experienced 4 quakes of (or more then) a 6 point magnitude. And a couple of 5 point (or greater) impacts elsewhere. ( one of those being a 5.9 quake ).
The details are all documented with needed links under the heading "The Belief Theory potential' in the Religion and philosphy forum.
Well, that should shake things up. (opinon).
During the "volconvo peer review" one recomendation was suggested to further test and confirm the fomula as outlined and it's proposed concluding facts. The suggested additional test would be designed to debunk any claim that it was just a lucky chance that the odds favored the projections I indicated in the prediction.
In spite of the idea that it could have been a lucky guess or whatever the fact still remans that the earthquakes happened as predicted. A future event was predicted in advance based on faith in my belief that I knew it would happen due to data from "out of the blue" , and has been documented and not 'faked'.
If you wish you can check out the topic thread and make your comments known. |
Heh, this was great. Almost as tough as predicting that there will be a full moon next month.
There are on average 120 earthquakes a year in the 6-6.9 range, 18 in the 7-7.9 range, and 1 in the range above that. This equates to 139 "major" earthquakes a year worldwide, for an average of more than 1 significant earthquake every 3 days. Pretty brave of you to establish a window for your prediction of two in 30 days.
Earthquake Facts & Figures