Quote:
The law is not objective.
We'll make this simple.
Answer the core question of the thread:
How is requiring CC-only denying you your ability to carry a gun?
Let me emphasize it for you...
How is requiring CC-only denying you your ability to carry a gun?
|
What the hell? It's been made abundantly clear to you. Stop ignoring the answers.
The right to do something means that the government can't tell you how to do it. Freedom of expression, as an example that's been pointed out, can not be constitutionally limited.
You do not have a right to not feel fear. Period. This leaves zero justification for any concealment laws in the first place.
And as Osborn said, my body is my property. Whether I want to carry a gun over or under my shirt is my business.
You also completely missed the point of the pool analogy. Yes, we know that pools aren't portable. That's because analogies compare situations to
other situations. :rolleyes:
The pool is in my yard, I own the cover, and I own the pool. If my neighbor fears exposed pools, he has no right to make me cover it.
Pool = Gun
Cover = Concealment
Neighbor = Ballistiphobic authoritarian
Understood?
I have a right to arrange my property however I want to, as long as it does not infringe upon your rights.