| Impenitent, stop twisting my words.
If he made anti-war statements in that uniform, he would be reflecting the US policy, if US policy was contrary that, he would possibly be condemned. He would be saying it as a representative of government.
When he speaks of religious crusades in that uniform, he is also representing the US Army and Government.
That's the point.
Like I said, had he not been in uniform, and speaking from his experiences as an intelligence director for the War on Terror, then calling it from his experience a war against Satan, I would have no problem.
However, he was in uniform, speaking as his position. Private prayer breakfast or not, he's representing the government. |