Nope, they don't, Praxius. Even when you are an American telling them... they still don't.
I seriously do not know if the ability to not connect the dots that have been laid since, for the sake of data set size only, Bush's campaign until today, if it is a showing of actual, natural and definitively 'normal' human thought and ability to observe and then attach meaning, or if there is an extra-natural occurrence happening to force this type of response. Anyway, what I am saying is that I am so unable to understand this that the only conclusion I can draw is that I am apparently not drinking enough tap water and thereby ingesting the brainwash drug. You can't look at and live in the beginnings of fascism when you used to be free from risk of fascism and not find it slightly disturbing. It doesn't take a real creative leap. Everyone disapproves of the guy but nobody really knows why? Seriously?
Also, the adage of like father like son is of course not universal. But, Bush has demonstrated that he fits within the context. His family does. His brother made him President of the United States. They are a family that will do whatever it takes for family. If dad wanted Iraq and grandpa wanted an American state modeled after Hitler and Mussolini's policies, adding that they are also related to, if unprovable the illuminati and masons yes, then at least the Project For The New American Century.
Welcome to the Project for the New American Century Start date- 1997.
I heard a very intelligent woman state in the earlier part of this fine new century that the thing she hates most about the Bush administration was that it made her feel like a conspiracy theorist for paying attention and finding that he was taking democratic rights away. She is not a young woman, and she is a long time member of the American Bar. Anyway, why am I qualifying her statement... my point is just that if you pay any eetsy bit of attention, if you are me or her, you feel as if it is time for the new revolution because this is a usurping of the country. But when you see that everyone else is not in agreement with you, you are faced with a dilemma... and a real understanding of what is posed with "If you alone are the only sane person in an entire world of insane people, then by definition you are the new insane" What's correct and true isn't concrete, it is proven to me.... god help us all.
Quote:
|
Finally, I do think that this comparison of Bush to Hitler is rather degrading to the memory of those who died in the holocaust. You can't simply compare someone whose policies you don't like to a man who killed millions of people merely because he didn't like their race. That is an illogical jump and is, at best, spurious propaganda.
|
Grandpa didn't aim to achieve fascism explicitly for purpose of genocide. the economic and social strategies of Hitler and Mussolini are what interested grandpa. Complete obedience in action at least is all it takes to commit an entire population to commit atrocity. We have genocides, we have the Holocaust. Fast forward to son, we have economic interest in Kuwait because of oil, we are friends with Saudi Arabia which is contra-American, we have Iraq with it's own dictator, he invades Kuwait, we fight saying it is because we want to free the Kuwaitis. It is really to secure oil. The thing that mosts upsets all of us is when Iraq burns the oil wells. Fast forward to grandson, we have an
at least atypical election- decided by the court because of a specific state's results who's Governor is the end winner's brother. We have an unprecedented attack on US soil that is completely contra to US capabilities to defend itself. We decide on a group that is responsible. It happens to be friends with Saudi Arabia. We let family members of the group we allege is responsible leave US soil without questioning, which is contra-US law theory and practice. We start war to find group and bring group to justice for what they did. We let all connection go when we had it, we still have not regained any connections nor have we brought group to justice. We say Iraq is connected to group, and is developing capabilities to attack us. There is no evidence, the UN is already in Iraq determining its intentions as it was since grandon's dad's war. We make UN leave. We declare war. We attack and effectively conquer within months. We are still at war, only now with the people of Iraq. We said 'war because weapons', no weapons, we say 'war because free people', people are "free" as freedom required no dictator- people are free we say 'war to get control of country' that no good to US public, we say 'war to plant democracy, free not enough', follow? There will always be a reason to be at war with Iraq, and it will always be different. It is necessary for the equation. see, perpetual war for perpetual peace. It is also necessary for people to accept the current reason. US people always have accepted each reason. So far, it is only necessary for US people to accept it, eventually though it will be true of Global people. It is also necessary to have war in two places at once at least so we will get things mixed up. Major events happening in quick succession both makes people very interested because it is dramatic, and also allows for us to forget things as they actually happened. see, witness memory accuracy rates- always deemed unreliable. We are witnessing fast events through an extended period of time. I swear, even I cannot keep it straight and I also do not feel the need to keep it straight... it is crazy how much psychology is consistent despite my attempts to stop it. Because- I am of the group it is being done to, even though I reject it absolutely it is happening to me in everything I do- work, socializing, thought. So, we have a form of mind control happening, also see subliminal message theory, not that I suggest something as dumb as putting messages in images in the media, that is just pointless. It is subliminally happening to all of us in everything as it is the thing that is defining us... I don't know if that is well expressed. Systems behavior is what I mean. You are always within the system, etc. So, we have a degree of control now and this control does not require any of us to agree. But, it requires we for the first few years believe that a good number of people agree. This means we as Americans can't deny liberty to people, so we can't take away the President if most people agree. It uses our best quality against us. We are obedient, at least in action only, through our ideals. It is sick, and twisted, and it is what has happened. That is what all the dots connected me to. All the occurrences, all the changes in tone and language. It has all been meticulous, and it has been successful. The next election has a fake opponent, even, who concedes, then virtually disappears. Now, we do not need to believe most people agree with president. An unplanned catastrophe happens which shapes that, Hurricane Katrina. It is unplanned, but eventually turns out to be very beneficial to attaining the goal. It brings out the best in people. This again serves to end up going against us. Things change to a tone of crusade. Things are fast, hard to know everything, it overwhelms us psychologically and emotionally. Things steady out, it is better than before, we are better. Iraq isn't as bad, nobody remembers the other war now. It doesn't matter what happens. Nobody likes president, but his term is almost over, so its going to be good to grin and bear it. This is contra-American, but no it isn't anymore. Because, this is now American because it is accepted. We have control, at least in action, and mostly in thought. Disagreement is allowed to still be ok, if it weren't then people would know it was fascism. Taking away rights little by little is just simple legislation, is what we're told, and the majority accepts, so those that don't accept can't change anything, because that would be taking away liberty. God damnit, it is logically impossible for us to break out of this dilemma because if what we need to preserve is liberty then we HAVE TO not infringe on the rights of anyone. The minority has minority rights still. The majority has majority rule still. We cannot break out of it because it is impossible, because logically it is not wrong at all. None of it is wrong. And if we could stop it, if we decided to stop it, we couldn't still, because it has been given its course and there is little to do to distract it. Logistically, defense and offense, the fascists have a lead that is not possible for the people to overcome. Maybe it will never be able to reach global proportions. I wonder if it was the plan all along that Americans would never be able to break the system of checks of balances, even though we all oh so vehemently declared it was gone, we were idiots, the system can't change because it's rules don't allow it. Jesus then, how is that liberty? Did my disillusion now cross the final barrier, the one thing I thought was a safeguard was our damn ideals... now that is gone for me, because now I convinced myself that the system doesn't allow our ideals because the system doesn't allow us to remove the government if it is fascist. What then? Am I ill-conceived? If anyone wants, please discredit me on that one piece.
jesus help us all.