[lsbskins1]

I believe in all of our Constitutional protections and I believe Michael Vick deserves a trial. I believe the government must prove it's case before he is convicted and that he should do no jail time without a conviction. That being said, being found Not Guilty in court does not mean you are not guilty of the crime, it only means the government could not "prove" your guilt. Michael Vick is plainly and clearly involved in this shameful sport and my conviction of that will not put him in jail for one day. That is what the constitutional protections are there to ensure, that he not be punished without due process. That does not mean his "reputation" can not be harmed, nor does it mean I can not believe him to be an evil waste of flesh. I do.