Quote:
So through "due process of law" your Constitutional rights can be infringed upon.
Now tell me how a law that says CC-only is infringing on your 2nd Amendment right.
|
Through due process the government can seize my property, take my life, or deprive me of liberty. Don't put words in my mouth.
Quote:
|
There you go again with rights. Just because a right isn't in the Constitution doesn't mean you don't have it.
|
It does if it somehow means I can't excercise one or more of my enumerated rights. That little clause basically means "and anything we forgot".
Quote:
|
If, in the exercise of your Constitutional rights, you endanger the safety of other citizens, the fact that you are exercising your right is not a defense.
|
Some times it is, sometimes it isn't. What matters is the context.
If someone sees an open carried gun, runs away, and knocks a puppy into a well, I'm not responsible for the damage, constitutionally speaking.
If that gun is pointed at someone maliciously, then there is clear intent to harm or kill. Any resulting action is the fault of the gunman.
Quote:
|
How is CC-only infringing on your right to carry a gun?
|
Already answered.
Quote:
|
Quote by: Myself For the same reason that controlling speech in any way is in violation of the first amendment.
Once you place a requirement on a right, it's no longer a right.
Let's apply a little logic:
1. Bearing arms is a right
2. Once you place a requirement on a right, it's no longer a right.
3. Bearing arms has no requirements.
The only constitutional obligation I have is to not infringe upon the rights of others in my bearing. |
Quote:
|
Quote by: Myself.. Again It would infringe upon my rights because it puts limits on it outside of protecting the rights of others. How many times do I have to say this? |