Volconvo Debate Forums - View Single Post

ZNFYRH · Jul 27, 2007, 02:56 pm

Kam

You have yet to demonstrate how requiring someone to carry a gun concealed is infringing upon their rights.

And you make a strange contradiction.

You say I have no right to peace, but the government tries to protect it. It's the government's job to protect my rights. So which is it?

Is it a right or not? If it's not, why does the gov't seek to protect it?

That's what I mean when I say your arguments are something of nonsense.

You say that inciting a panic is not a Constitutional offense. It is, however, a legal offense. What you fail to understand that the Constitution allows you a right. What the law does is punish you for the consequences of exercising that right.

Again, the Constitution does not protect you from the consequences of your rights. You have the right to say what you want to a person, but you aren't protected from having your face punched in.

Requiring that guns be CC instead of OC is eliminating the potential for panic. There is no legal difference between wearing the gun in a holster openly and having the gun in your hand. The legal perspective is that the OC has the potential to cause panic.

Now answer this... how does CC-only infringe on the 2nd Amendment?

Jul 27, 2007, 02:56 pm	#54 (permalink) (top)
ZNFYRH Volcanic Erupter Posts: 4,375	Kam You have yet to demonstrate how requiring someone to carry a gun concealed is infringing upon their rights. And you make a strange contradiction. You say I have no right to peace, but the government tries to protect it. It's the government's job to protect my rights. So which is it? Is it a right or not? If it's not, why does the gov't seek to protect it? That's what I mean when I say your arguments are something of nonsense. You say that inciting a panic is not a Constitutional offense. It is, however, a legal offense. What you fail to understand that the Constitution allows you a right. What the law does is punish you for the consequences of exercising that right. Again, the Constitution does not protect you from the consequences of your rights. You have the right to say what you want to a person, but you aren't protected from having your face punched in. Requiring that guns be CC instead of OC is eliminating the potential for panic. There is no legal difference between wearing the gun in a holster openly and having the gun in your hand. The legal perspective is that the OC has the potential to cause panic. Now answer this... how does CC-only infringe on the 2nd Amendment? IT'S A BOY!!