Quote:
|
If either of you wants to tell me how requiring that a gun be concealed is infringing on the 2nd Amendment, that would be the best way to convince me I'm wrong.
|
You could start with reading our posts. That's the brilliance of the internet, you can go back and read what you've ignored at least once.
Quote:
|
Are you two done telling me how to post?
|
If someone posted only in French, I would advise him to use English for a higher volume of responses.
If someone posted gibberish, I would ask him to make sense of it.
You channeled your efforts into .. well, something that must have caught your attention outside of this discussion, because I don't see a lot of it in your posts. I said so, and I'm not the only one.
There is one of two things you could be thinking, if you weren't dodging:
1. That we are both idiots and can't tell when a point has been ignored.
2. That we are both idiots and can't tell when we've made a point.
If you're not dodging, I suggest you reread my post for the points that were missed. Unless you think I'm an idiot, then this "debate"* is pointless.
*I put debate in "'s because debate requires reciprocation of counterpoints.