Quote:
Quote by: Athena  This thread is about an abstract God that can not be defined, verses a personal God that is defined by religion. Do you have something to say on this subject? |
"None of the religions advance mathematics and the sciences, therefore, none of them can bring us closer to perfect consciousness. The advances of the west you seem to value, are the result of math, philosophy and science, not religion. A tranquil mind will not recieve this knowledge, as our lungs recieve air. If we desire perfect consciousness we must study math, science and philosophy with the purpose of gaining knowledge. This isn't what religion does for us."
So, if I post proof of a religious mind capable of advancing human knowledge, you change the subject trying to pull a moderator power trip. I guess that's one way to debate..
but not mine..well, ok, maybe..
my turn..
Please respond to this thread topic like I did respond to your statement quoted above.