| Yeah indeed.... something's not right.....
And if it was US troops that were fired on, as mentioned above and in previous incidences, it would have been covered up by another situation they would explain to the public.... since we know some of the details as well, they gotta explain in a manner that doesn't make it look like the system made an error, but the pilot...... in multiple cases in the last number of years since the wars started..... and not just on Canadian troops as shown in previous post linked by Jose..... and not just UK.....
Air Strikes on Civilian compounds, the Marines who went on a rampage from apparently being ambushed, although most of the injured and dead were civilians and families parked in their cars on the side of the roads after they were told to pull to the side...... and then confiscating film and other media from reporters who arrived on the scene?
I could list two pages of articles of seperate questionable incidences, that were either never explained or partially explained. Every other country in NATO for example, have always reported the incident, how many people were involved, what time, location, what division was attacked or did the attacking, what was the intelligence behind the mission, etc.....
And what do we get form the US? Something just doesn't add up right and it's very unsettling. |