Quote:
Nice try (actually it was a pretty pathetic try). The Nazi decided to commit mass-murder across Europe on current citizens. They weren't denying a right to citizenship, they were denying a person's right to live.
Every country including NK and Germanyhas a right to select their own immigration scheme.
|
Hahaha. Your knowledge of history is pathetic. First they denied citizenship, then they started killing them.
Quote:
|
In the years following the Nazi rise to power, many Jews fled the country and were encouraged to do so. By the time the Nuremberg Laws were passed in 1935, Jews were stripped of their German citizenship and denied government employment.
|
Nazi Germany - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You also realise that your whole argument relies on the natural law idea that rights is a loose concept that is defined by one's "morals". Whatever the latter is suppose to mean (to me it just means making up your laws as you go). Rights are limited to the positive laws applied by the state of a country. Meaning that if Israel decides to be racist concerning immigration, that is a right, but then again if the Soviet Union made it a right that those who do not labour hard deserve the death penalty or deportation to Siberian labour camps, then by the same logic, it's not like we could scold them for it either.
Quote:
|
LOL, the Chinese need more skilled labor? LOL, a labor shortage is something the Land of a few billion people doesn't need!
|
Actually, if you knew anything about China, you'd also happen to know that the majority of that population is rural and depends on farming. Many others are construction workers and other low end labour jobs. We can thank a less than adequate public education in the rural areas and a lack of University and admittance for the lack of skilled labour (it's harder to get into the Beijing University of Art than to get into Harvard Law). It's also part of China's wish to be more economically open to the rest of the world and get more skilled labour fluent in business languages rather than ESL graduates.
Quote:
|
Ignorance is bliss I guess!
|
Yeah, 60 so years of violence and war. What a success.
Quote:
|
Conceptions of race, as well as specific ways of grouping races, vary by culture and over time, and are often controversial for scientific as well as social and political reasons. Since the 1940s, most evolutionary scientists have rejected the view that race is a biologically meaningful concept.[citation needed] Some argue that although "race" is a valid taxonomic concept in other species, it cannot be applied to humans.[2] Mainstream scientists have argued that race definitions are imprecise, arbitrary, derived from custom, have many exceptions, have many gradations, and that the numbers of races delineated vary according to the culture making the racial distinctions; they thus reject the notion that any definition of race pertaining to humans can have taxonomic rigour and validity.[3] Today most scientists study human genotypic and phenotypic variation using more rigorous concepts such as "population" and "clinal gradation." Many anthropologists contend that while the features on which racial categorizations are made may be based on genetic factors, the idea of race itself, and actual divisions of persons into groups based on selected hereditary features, are social constructs,[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] whereas a new opinion among geneticists is that it should be a valid mean of classification, although in a modified form based on DNA analysis.[11][12][13][14]
|
Race - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Yeah, what would us lowly educated scientists, biologists, sociologists, political scientists, and anthropologists know about the concept of race.