| The facts of the case are conclusive, Zheng Xiaoyu was guilty of causing many deaths. However, his role was not as direct as that of an assasin. What is the quality of evidence showing Xiaoyu's intent, knowledge, awareness..? Likely documenting this requires reference to the implementation of management decisions despite counsel to the contrary. Without dismissing the magnitude of the wrongs wrought in this case, I'd be mindful of notions like business judgment, practice in the industry, level of oversight and risk.
Et semel emissum volat irrevocabile verbum.
Raúl M. Núñez Sheriff |