| the language we use to describe the things-in-themselves isn't universally true...
yet the things-in-themselves are universally true?
but you cannot know the things-in-themselves...
all you have is the description... describe and describe and describe in a never ending attempt to get to the actual definitive description... of course this is nothing but convention... mathematics and physics and all other sciences are nothing but circular systems of descriptions that are true circularly...
"I really like this jacket, but the sleeves are much too long..."
insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results... |