Quote:
Quote by: Kuldeep  @sdbest
Better suggestion to Jern would be to discuss the idea in his mind with somebody in person who, after proper understanding, would frame a post message on his behalf.
I think he wants to convey something interesting but, is not able to convey properly due to lack of comand on language.
ryanatau, I admire your nice efforts to bring out some hidden meaning out of, not so clear thought. But Jern is not satisfied with that !!!
Let me empty my mind here as a guess what Jern probably mean :
We have developed a sense of dimension of space in say meteric system. Using this system, the smallest object which can be measured is Photon, or may be he means Proton or electron. This does not matter much, as far as I have understood his mind.
His second post removes the doubt that he is not talking about physical dimensions. He is imagining this universe made up of infinite points. Now these points can have imaginary dimesional limits from + inifinity to - infinity.
Under such conditions, smallest can be equivalent to largest and largest equivalent to smallest. In other words, point would be a part of whole and whole would be a part of point. In yet in other words, one in all and all in one. Finally this means duality which we physically concieve in our universe is, in absolute reality an illusion only.
Hence:
ONE AND ONLY ONE POINT EXIST WHICH HAS LIMITS FROM - INFINITY TO + INFINITY.
If that is what Jern meant I would name that imaginary ONE something as my SOMETHING (GOD), which I have explained in thread Special debate "Existence of God" in miscellaneous section. |
Getting corrected about grammar and language I should go hit myself with a bamboo stick until I beat all of that hasty non-editing mind-set out of me.
I'm sorry about being vague my mind had formed a complete picture but I didn't want to ramble on for 10 pages to explain it. I should have done a much better job. Well I think I have tried (and failed) at getting forgiveness enough for now.
I find it disturbing the Kuldeep was able to extract that much of what I wanted to say. My point was in the long run that any dimensional point has a capacity to be infinitely small or large.
Technosoul's speculation brought an idea. If a universe existed within our own would it be infinitely large from the prospective of an observer within that universe? It is small relative to us but in that case; is infinity capable of being defined when compared to another infinity that is proven to be larger? Is infinity, as an undefined number have a different value in each universe within a multiverse? Would there be constants to infinity in a multiverse as each universe within it is infinity onto its own?