Thread: Burden Of Proof
View Single Post
Old Jul 2, 2007, 02:10 am   #1 (permalink) (top)
derek
What do you think?
 
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 24
Burden Of Proof

I've always assumed the burden of proof rests on the theist. It seems that instead of assuming something's real because we haven't officially disproven it, that we should assume it's not real until it's proven. Can anybody disprove that invisible, undetectable flying unicorns are pushing the earth and playing a role in its rotation? (a silly analogy, but I think you get my point)
derek is offline   Reply With Quote