Pooey, I'm shocked but not suprised at your simplistic reasoning.
Quote:
|
Yes, the interview of a retired Professor in an Economics magazine is really going to demolish a composite report from thousands of scientists
|
Define composite report
by thousands of scientists for us? In fact the IPCC report
is its own summation of the conclusions of studies by scientists, is it not? There is no real consensus among the scientists and the overall conclusions of the IPCC? You have tried to use that illogical ruse before?
This expert reveals that the IPCC has rigged the data in at least one area of climate influences. If the IPCC has rigged the data to buttress its conclusions is it reasonable to conclude it has an agenda and is not afraid to shape data and conclusions to favor that agenda? We've discussed the use of 'proxies' before. If that isn't shaping the process I don't know what is?
You can illogically defend the climate alarmists all you want but I'm afraid the alarmist house of cards is tumbling down...It all gets back to the trade off of resources and certainty? Is it prudent to expend resources to try to change something we are not certain we can change?