Quote:
So because you can't prove it, you should be perfectly validated in using an abstract concept you don't fully understand in making a syllogism. Brilliant logic, there.
Anyway, drop it. It was but one hole I found in Lull's argument, and trying to exploit that particular one aroused far too much belligerence for my liking.
|
Oh, please. Im not trying to support lull's argument just to make you angry. I dont care if i support it or not.
And my logic was not that it should be valideted because nothing can be proven, but because
something cannot come from nothing. And i do think you are being quite unreasonable for not wanting to admit that, and i think you are trying to use the fact that nothing can be absolutely proven to dodge that. There is a reason that the say "proven beyond reasonable doubt" when dealing with law-enforcement.
Quote:
|
an abstract concept you don't fully understand
|
And that is quite condescending, it would be nice if you would refrain from such things when arguing.