Quote:
Quote by: pahl  It was still a vaild question. And how did you conclude that i was trying to mock you?
I was trying to ask you how long you where going to make me prove something. Cause that could go on forever.
Name one thing that does not require anything else to be true. |
So because you can't prove it, you should be perfectly validated in using an abstract concept you don't fully understand in making a syllogism. Brilliant logic, there.
Anyway, drop it. It was but one hole I found in Lull's argument, and trying to exploit that particular one aroused far too much belligerence for my liking.