Quote:
lsbskins1
If humans, finding themselves in unregulated circumstances, always revert to some form of regulation, is it not best to attempt to foster the form of regulation that is best able to achieve some sort of ballance between the collective good and individual rights? Anarchy does not hold in the long run. It can not be "fostered", by it's very definition. It can not be imposed. It can not be enforced, so it fails |
.
Anarchism is a regulated system .
One that does not use centralised government but decentralised government.
There is a big difference between the words anarchy and anarchism.
The first implies no government and the second self government.
What definition of anarchism are you using.?
Also your last statement which I put in bold implies that government only works if the people are foced against there will to obey. Is this the only way you see society working?
Somalia is not anarchism it is anarchy.
A better example would be the spanish preWWII anrchist states such as the Anarchosyndicalist Ideology of Barcelona