Quote:
Quote by: xyzer Come come pooey..Not so fast. You can't dismiss counter argument with this type nonsense... |
I'd hardly call the collective conclusion of the majority of scientist as mere nonsense.
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer Vicchio and I have posted plenty of expert counter sources...who are not convinced! |
No you haven't, you've posted rehashed arguments that don't have a leg to stand on once as soon we look at it in detail.
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer Here is the latest which you will no doubt look at and discard? High price for load of hot air | The Courier-Mail
From the source.. The salient facts are these. First, the accepted global average temperature statistics used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change show that no ground-based warming has occurred since 1998. Oddly, this eight-year-long temperature stasis has occurred despite an increase over the same period of 15 parts per million (or 4 per cent) in atmospheric CO2. |
The IPCC doesn't carry out any research, what's he on about? The relationship between temperature and CO2 is not completely linear but nevertheless, the
trend is still there. Let's not forget that it was due to El Nino that
1998 was such a record breaker.
Quote:
| Second, lower atmosphere satellite-based temperature measurements, if corrected for non-greenhouse influences such as El Nino events and large volcanic eruptions, show little if any global warming since 1979, a period over which atmospheric CO2 has increased by 55 ppm (17 per cent). |
This has been explained. Now, how is it that Professor can repeat the same old outdated arguments? I'm not impressed.
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer You assert certainty to the conclusions of a political organization? IPCC?
The article notes.. |
The IPCC merely collates all the reports and conclusions from independent studies. Even if you don't care for their conclusions then you've still got ALL the National Academies of Science to contend with along with any major scientific organisation.
Quote:
Quote by: xyzer |
So you're going to go down this route of a conspiracy then?