Quote:
Quote by: Fangrim  Zhavric, if you want to go that route instead of actually debating, then very well.
Your entire thread is invalidated because it makes assumptions. The God Hypothesis remains unproven, both ways. |
LOL
Ridiculous. "God exists" contradicts too much of what we already know to be true to be the other side of the coin as you've alleged. Assumptions are premises we take without evidence. The points in my post are evidenced or self-evidencing.
Quote:
|
"I'd also like to point out that I'm not a "pure" nothingist. My position is that nothing can be proven unless we assume a premise to be true, and there's nothing wrong with that (that nothing can be proven, not that it is my position). We can't ignore it; we just have to live with it."
|
Yes, this is where you invalidated your argument and everything you allege. According to you, claims can only be proven if we take certain things to be true without evidence. This is a stance that's supported absolutely nowhere in acadamia nor does it have any place in a rational debate.
We know god doesn't exist for the reasons I've stated. If you're interested in un-disarming yourself and participating in the debate you're going to need to accept A) Nothing can be proven is a paradoxical statement and thus false and B) Premises which are self-evident or supported with evidence aren't "assumed".