Quote:
Quote by: Kamehameha34  A dumb answer for a dumb question.
So, because you see people swerving on the road, you're assuming
a. That they are all drunk
b. That there aren't any drunks not swerving around
Your logic doesn't work on any level. |
I assume that there aren't any drunks not making sloppy use of common traffic skills worthy of being pulled over. Missing a stop sign, forgetting to signal, swerving, braking too late/early, other erratic behavior.
Unless your destination is so short a distance from where you were drinking to where you intend on going that you have no room to make an error in traffic law then you didn't need to drive anyhow.
I don't see how anyone could be in favor of people driving under the influence, or not receiving punishment for driving under the influence.
When someone drives impaired, or drunk, or stoned, or what have you, they should have some moral sense in themselves that tells them they are at a greater risk for motor vehicular failure.