Quote:
Quote by: pikatore  The health argument clearly isn't valid, because you are recommending a diet which our biology CLEARLY wasn't designed for. No research paper can ever prove otherwise. |
It surely is, and you are clearly going against experts in nutrition if you think a vegetarian diet is not a valid diet that we and our biology can thrive on in today's world. Your argument is not so much with me, but with a well respected group and yourself for not being able to grasp what they are telling us.
Quote:
|
No, it's stuck in the present, and it's stuck in reality.
|
That is right! We are stuck in the present and moving forward every moment. We no longer need an ancient diet to thrive -- in fact, even Pythagorus and his group of geometrists were vegetarians thousands of years ago, and it did not affect their mental faculties. But, being in the present, we can choose a modern meatless diet and be just as healthy as omnivores and have additional health benefits with that choice. Of course you don't understand that, because you are taking the ostrich stick its head in the hole stance refusing to seek out the ADA paper.
Quote:
|
I'm sorry, I don't need to read the paper.
|
lol. See? Ostrich with head in hole syndrome.
Quote:
|
I know enough about my body and yours to know that a vegetarian diet is competely unnessecary.
|
Where have I ever said it was necessary? All I have ever said is that a modern vegetarian diet provides us with all the things our bodies need to be at an optimal level of performance, or just as well as any omnivore, plus, as the ADA reports, it offfers some additional benefits that a meat based diet does not.
You have utterly failed in providing any data support from a large group of experts with a respected reputation with their findings published in respected peer related journals to suggest the opposite. I doubt you could find that with the ostrich in hole syndrom your style of argument seems to be afflicted with.
You are well behind, and embarrassingly so. Get busy.