| Pooey, you list organizations that have credence, but I see far too much political and money games going on to put as much stock as you do in them.
I KNOW meteorology man, it was my job, 10 years of my life. I understand it better then you, I just do. I don't buy into the "man is causing global warming" and neither do some VERY presitgious scientists. I do know that many groups like the NAS and others you cite rely on grants and federal dollars to function, and with all the political fervor over Global Warming I see the bottom line winning out over science.
Think about that angle for a second... if they come out against global warming, those paying them (politicians) will find someone else to fund.
That is one of my BIGGEST problems with the global warming hysteria. How many federal grants are going into studying global warming as a natural phenomenon, even just to counter and ensure what's out there is right, and how much money is going into giving us "solutions" to global warming, all of which happen to empower government.
Yeah, go do the research Pooey, YOU might be surprised to find I've got a valid point.
Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? |