| It's not that it's unreliable, I didn't say that.
My POINT Pooey, is that back then, when the alarmist came out, there was scientific discourse and the situation debated, tested and generally disproved.
Today, people that question Global Warming are castigated by the media, by government agencies with a stake in the GW game.
Does it ever occur to you that perhaps this is just a political football, whose backers have personal gain in mind rather then science?
Einstein's "Theory of Relativity" is still being challenged to this day, but by consensus Global Warming is a fact... that's REAL science at work, why didn't Albert just go that route? |