Here is another article that reveals even more doubters of the alarmist theories we've been exposed to..
http://http://www.counterpunch.com/c...n06092007.html
I invite you to read this revealing article. As we've covered before Pooey there are other factors which affect climate still unexplained and not included in scientific models. e.g. atmospheric moisture.
Quote:
|
The Achilles' heel of the computer models (which form the cornerstone of CO2 fearmongering), is their failure to deal with water. As vapor, it's a more important greenhouse gas than CO2 by a factor of twenty, yet models have proven incapable of dealing with it. The global water cycle is complicated, with at least as much unknown as is known.
|
There are a number of other scientific areas that have been unused in the formulations of the conclusions (appraisal) by the IPCC. e.g. geological records and the imperciseness of ice core data?
And then there is this one...
Quote:
|
Besides the inability to deal with water, the other huge embarrassment facing the modelers is the well-researched and well-established fact published in many papers that temperature changes first and CO2 levels change 600 to 1,000 years later. Any rational person would immediately conclude that CO2 could not possibly cause temperature if the rise in CO2 in comes centuries after the rise in temperature. The computer modelers as usual have an involuted response: They say the temperature increase is initiated by the "relatively weak" effect of increasing heat from the sun during the rising phase of the Milankovich cycle (Milankovich's meticulously calculated cycles on rising and falling heat input from the sun are universally accepted by astrophysicists). That effect initiates the warming of the oceans, which - just as Dr. Martin Hertzberg says - releases lots of CO2. According to the modelers the released CO2 is the real culprit because it amplifies the "relatively weak" effect of the sun, turning minor warming into a really serious matter.
|
Also the article contains a list of some of the expert dissidents against dogma!
From what I observe we are being swept over a waterfall of alarmist hyperbole? The IPCC's agenda driven arm, demagogues like Gore. a sensation seeking press, et al.