Quote:
Quote by: Zhavric  I fail to see anything here beyond more god-of-the-gaps reasoning. This argumentation makes a massive assumption that god exists and then seeks to use sketchy science & quote mined science to prove it's claims.
Nothing new here. |
Regardless of whether they use God as the gap-filler, it's still a scientific endeavor to try to point out a gap in the first place.
I would have preffered that they let it be unfilled, but we Christians are eager to go around to every pothole in the highway of science and fill it with holy water.
It's possible that this author has found something intriguing, but it wouldn't be proof of God; it would only be, at most, proof of a hole that God can still fill.