Thread: Science & Sin.
View Single Post
Old Jun 11, 2007, 02:31 am   #10 (permalink) (top)
Technosoul
Volcanic Erupter
 
Posts: 8,936
Quote:
Quote by: Isherwood View Post
I just don't see how you propose to examine a philosophical term that has no consistent definition. Sin is a subjective perception. A hypothesis requires you to define your terms at the very least. There's no objective standard for sin, evil, base or bad. If you can't define the terms, how can you test for a genetic causation?
I did define it relative to biblical storytelling. Sin is the physical medical problem - in healing the medical condition Jesus said "your sin is forgiven". Sin and sickness are the same thing in the eyes of Jesus and anyone who thinks like he did. Disease is the physical appearence of the sin nature. In theology the mind, body and spirit are all one idenity and called the human being. As science continues to prove that the orgins of how the human being is controlled by these hand-me-down genes we can project they will find out that everything that makes up what is human is related to that genetic influence.
Technosoul is offline   Reply With Quote