Quote:
Quote by: pikatore  I just viewed it, and instanly had problems.
Gravity is BOTH something that can originate from the centre of a large object, and be an attractive force.
That's why all objects have a centre of gravity, and massive spherical ones like the earth pull things towards it's center. It's semantics really.
This energy force was thought to be born very quickly AFTER the big bang took place, not be a pre-existent force on it's own.
Before you suggest these crazy new theories written by some apologist, you should try reading some more credible books like a brief history of time. |
'A Brief History of Time" and the theories contained in it was read by the author and commented upon. The thing is the webpage did not show all the stuff written in the book and so it cannot properly debated without having the book. I just found out about the book Saturday when it was mentioned to me by a person visiting a garage sale I had at my house.
I did read his first book "The Science of Life" that came out in the 1960s and is now out of print but do not recall all the details.
The thing is he is claiming that you (science) has got it backwards and he has presented evidence and logic to counter-act the mainstream theories.
Now a whirlpool in a stream of water would seem to pull things into it's center - does that center contain "gravity", a attaction or are things pushed into it by the surrounding density of motion? Time-space motion would be the surrounding force that pushes from all sides and there-by causing the compacting effect. That is all I can get from the limited audio and printed material used at that webpage to promote the book.
Your idea is based party on the theory of the Big Bang, in the book History of Time, time would somehow reverse and implode back to the center or it's orginating point. Read the printed link where author Roy Masters commented on that and debate his comment about how silly that sounds.
In the past I have come across some of this other books relative to phychology and found them to be sensible. So based on that I recomended this new book.
All you did so far is say that another idea is the one you favor and so no new ideas matter, you have made up your mind. But that is not actually debating the new idea or the ideas supporting it.