| Bacon is an Anti. He will be Anti whatever. He would be against anything the US does. If W. were to provide three square meals to every child in the world until they turned 18, Bacon would complain. First he would say the meals were not nutritionally sound. Second he would complain about the age cut off, it should be 25 or 30. Next, he would complain about how giving someone a free food detracts from their ability to feed themself. Then he would complain about how corporations were getting rich off of the deal.
Threre's really no point in reading anything he says because it's just another Anti statement.
And now to dispell some of his statement. I know I'm just wasting my time because BB will simply ignore anything that disproves what he says and try throwing another Anti statement our way as some sort of antiproof. Kind of like someone throwing chairs a a pursuer. Keep throwing objects in the way and the pursuer will just quit and BB will think he's won the debate.
Anyway, justification for the Crusades. Sure there was some maltreatment of christians in the holy land. Was it the natural state in the region? Certainly not. Jews, christians, and muslims co-habitated in the holy land for centuries before anyone decided to launch a crusade. Mistreatment of christians and access to the holy sites was simply the "justification" for launching the crusades. The real reasons concerned western european politics.
Next, I guess BB is saying the US invaded Iraq at the behest of Israel. Why of course, how could anyone miss this. If Israel, or Zionist were pulling the US's strings, don't you think something different would have happened during the Arab Israeli wars? Do you think there would be ANY sort of Palestinian sponsored violence going on? I know BB is a youngster, but come on, pick up a history book once in a while.
Next, I'll skip some of the more essoteric bits of this part since I really don't want to know what he's talking about. Here we go, Jews were the first persecutors of the christian church. Uh, just how did the Jews get the Romans to throw christians into the arena in Rome? I suppose Jews were pulling Rome's strings like they are pulling the US's now? Oh, but wait, Emperor Titus destroyed the Jewish state in the 6th decade AD. Actually, I believe it was in the 8th decade, but lets not quible. Jews hated christians for the next 2000 years. Right, Jews tried their hardest to get along with christians in Europe ever since the diaspora. It was christians who persecuted Jews off and on for those 2000 years. I don't know what mainstream publications he's refering to but I really doubt they would illustrate an ongoing animosity towards christianity, certainly nothing supporting his 2000 year old hatred position. In fact, he only mentions these papers' nervousness about Mel's The Passion as evidence of this ancient hatred. I have no doubt some Jewish publications squaked rather loudly about this movie. However, I rather doubt the more mainstream papers were as vehement as BB indicates. I would imagine the louder the squawking, the more radical the rag.
Lastly, we're being led around by the nose by Jewish Zionists. Uh huh, sure we are. Now this is a good one. Compugasm caught it too. This invasion, supposedly for oil and enriching Halliburton, is now being prosecuted out of our sense of sentimental goodwill.
Ya see folks, whatever it takes to be Anti is okay to this guy.
Oh yeah. We have a really cool pen now and the Ruskis don't. They had to spend $12 billion on an atmospheric cleanser for their capsules to vacumm out all the pencil shavings. |