View Single Post
Old Jun 6, 2007, 01:55 pm   #16 (permalink) (top)
The Decider
Hot Lava
 
Posts: 1,663
Quote:
Quote by: Autolykos View Post
Yes. It's the policies that are bad, not the consistency and integrity in their service.
If consistency and integrity prevent the purist from changing bad polices, then we usually call that stubborn foolishness. Consistency and integrity in the service of bad policies lead to bad outcomes.

Quote:
Quote by: Autolykos View Post
When they betray their principles while continuing to uphold them, yes.
One can compromise without betraying principles. We may disagree about what those principles are, however.

Quote:
Quote by: Autolykos View Post
Even if this is true, it's meaningless to me here.
I thought relevant real world examples might help to flesh out the abstract. My bad.
The Decider is offline   Reply With Quote