| I found this interesting, Zhavric.
You said on the first page:
"Please don't use analogies...Stick to debating what's being said and leave analogies be."
On the last page:
"Of course they wouldn't have. They weren't real. You may as well say, 'Lois Lane would NEVER miss a chance to tell the world who Superman really is, but she doesn't!' and demand we see that as 'evidence' of Superman's existense."
I believe you used a couple other "Superman" analogies, too.
Is that not an analogy, and therefore an inconsistency in your words?
P.S. Zhavric, I was wondering if you would put a link to this in your signature.
I have been driven to my knees by the overwhelming conviction that I had no where else to go.
Last edited by OratorDeVeritas; Jun 5, 2007 at 07:04 pm.
|