There you go again Pooey?
Quote:
|
I'm sorry but did you actually read the article? It refers to a poll in 1992 to which I have no access to. Are you expecting me to take the The Financial post of Canada as a prime source of info for the scientific community?
|
Vicchio answered your usual simplistic reaction to the article. Did
you read the whole thing? Of course he referred to Gores original 1992 nonsense. That was the reason he researched the issue.
I posted only the reference to the recent article and if you read it you can't help but get the drift. There are plenty of reputable scientists who dispute your, and the IPCC, alarmist predictions.
This directly refutes your several posts assuring us that the majority of the worlds scientists agreed with the IPCC and Gores conclusions. I have repeatedly questioned your believing in the
certainty of the IPCC conclusions. This article and the series show there are plenty who didn't assign certainty to the conclusions. From what I get from all this is that anthropogenic CO2 is not conclusively a major cause. Most seem to feel further research is in order.